Probably the best academic treatment of why modern foods play a role in diseases of civilization.
RANT ALERT: Sexism and Paleo

While the MacLeans article on paleo was one of the better ones, I think the illustration they chose (above) is indicative of what's wrong with paleo media coverage. While there have been exceptions, nearly every reporter I've talked to about paleo has asked me ridiculously sexist questions pulled out of some sort of pulp caveman fantasy. "Do do the guys doing the paleo diet club women and bring them back to their caves?" was one of the worst.

It's fiction people.
It doesn't help that there are more than a few paleo dieters willing to go along with this and frame paleo as a way to pick up hot chickz and to reclaim a ridiculous idea of masculinity. Guess what? While evolutionary psychology has some lessons, it's been distorted to justify disgusting behaviors that have nothing to do with being human. Real hunter-gatherers are diverse: some have rigid gender hierarchies and others don't. But such men don't want to hear about the complexities of human cultures, they just want to cover up their own very-real inadequecies by spouting nonsense about how manliness is being oppressed by modern society.
Nevermind that it's women who are the ones consistently shamed away from eating meat, hunting, and fishing, among other things. The wimpiness of our culture cuts across the gender divide. Did you know the foragers have LOWER testosterone than studied hunter-gatherers? American men are crash and burn- high testosterone when young probably leds to stupidity and aggression, which quickly fizzles out into viagra-popping territory.
In the media's stupidthropology, men in the Stone age hunted while women pattered about with children on their backs gathering the makings of an organic argula-walnut salad. Guess what? Gathering is a dumb word that demeans the role of women, because in the anthropology world it includes fishing, trapping, and hunting game- often with complex traps and nets. But this is consistently ignored, even by female writers.
And guess what- the Stone Age wasn't an era of hot muscular men having sex with a zillion ladies while the wimps were beaten into the jungle. Humans are not bonobos. We are wired for "monogamy," though this biological term has little to do with the modern Christian fantasy of having one partner for the rest of your life. Rather, it seems humans bear biological marks of serial monogamy with some furtive extra-pair copulation....with as all things human, quite a bit of diversity in terms of sexual preferences.
- Melissa's blog
- Login to post comments
Post to Twitter

Comments
It's hard to defend a
It's hard to defend a misogynistic viewpoint without ignoring the evolutionary insight Darwin himself thought was his most important contribution. So many people get hung up on "survival of the fittest" (natural selection) as discussed in Origin while ignoring the focus of his work Descent of Man that came out 12 years later. Factoring sexual selection into the equation is a significant equalizer.
I the word choice used to
I the word choice used to depict this kind of lifestyle is flawed on a fundamental level. Paleo, hunter gatherer, caveman: these words depict ancient historical societies and people, not a modern lifestyle. You're co-opting words and phrases that already have a connotation in american popular culture, of course the media coverage is going to be tainted by it.
When people ask me what I call my particular diet/lifestyle/way of living, I tell them I'm a diabetic celiac. It describes my actions a lot better than paleo or caveman, especially when I'm always surrounded by technology (I'm a computer programmer).
This year I took a politic
This year I took a politic class in college and the professor decided to talk about political anthropology and said that a while ago they discovered a tribe where the ''hunters'' were female, and the ''gatherers'' and children keeps were male. Basicly,if we were to think that the conception the media has of cavemen ( Men on a power trip, dominated female) is true, then this is a good proof that its false.
I cant remember the name of the tribe.
JP
Thanks for the post and the
Thanks for the post and the great links!
As if gathering would be
As if gathering would be easy, anyway. Seriously, stalking game while dangerous is a lot easier in many ways. I'd certainly prefer it. There's a reason that genetically, in general, men have more strength and women more stamina. Burst efforts versus sustained efforts.
Sometimes it's hard to shake the male-dominated fantasies and ideals that permeated our culture for so long. Sometimes one stumbles into them by accident. And sometimes reporters try to be cute when they don't have a clue what they're talking about.
Nice post, Melissa. Sexism is
Nice post, Melissa. Sexism is a persistent thought-pattern, isn't it? Eager to project itself onto whatever comes its way--one of the more unfortunate traps in which we've managed to ensnare ourselves.
Just look at the Hadzu, a
Just look at the Hadzu, a modern hunter-gatherer group that have been around for over 10k years. The do change sexual partners on a whim, but on the woman's whim. There is one long-lasting monogamous relationship, but they all agree that it is rather rare.