The Human Colon in Evolution: Part 5, Human Variation


Warning message

Welcome to the site! This content is old and may not reflect my current opinions. I keep it up mainly for reference and because I hope at least some of it is still good, but I encourage you to check out more recent posts as well as my Start Here page

The following presents data that gasp...people might be different and those differences might correspond to ethnic groups/"races." I would note that research in this area is scant because funding is hard to come by since it's so controversial. I know American researchers who have gotten funded for this research though and then have been pressured to suppress their results. Either way, it's important to identify the specific causes (genes, diet, environment, etc.) of such variation when applying it to health since often such characteristics aren't exclusive to one group, but merely of a different frequency

Some humans may be better at fermenting than others. Recent studies of human gut variation have revealed possible genetic variations as well as those caused by environment and lifestyle. There have been a few studies of human gut anatomical variation, but more are needed. One of the most interesting comes from South Africa, where researchers examined the colons in 590 cadavers (Madiba & Haffajee, 2011a). They found significant variation in colon morphology and made the decision to classify colons into three types based on anatomical differences. Classic was the normal shape in typical anatomy book. The long-narrow was longer and had a redundant long sigmoid flexure between the descending colon and rectum with narrow mesocolon root. The long-broad type also had a redundant long sigmoid flexture, but the mesentery was broader and the limbs of the loop for further apart.


The study found that Africans were more likely to have the long-narrow type and the least likely to have the classic type. Indians and whites were more likely to have the classic type and less likely to have the long-narrow type.

Are these differences a result of genes or environment? It is hard to tease out in the moment. There are a few animal studies showing gut size can be affected by diet, but none in humans. (Topping et al., 1997). The authors of the autopsy study noted that the difference was also found in children and that unlike in other animals, including the other great apes, human colons are not known to enlarge with age. (Madiba & Haffajee, 2011b). A limit to this particular study was that “African” represents the most genetically diverse population on Earth. Some preliminary work in Uganda showed that colon size varies between different African tribes, with the Baganda having larger colons than the other tribes studied (Katsarski & Singh, 1977). There is a strong possibility that colonic variation is connected with adaptations to diet and ongoing evolution of the digestive tract. The digestive implications of these anatomical differences remains to be studied, but there is a strong possibility the colon has continued to decrease in size in populations less and less reliant on colonic fermentation for nutrients and more and more able to acquire high-quality food.

It is also possible that gut size calculations based on a broader population would alter the equations Aiello and Wheeler used in the Expensive Tissue Hypothesis, either reducing the trade-off between brain and gut or finding that the tradeoff is present and variable between human populations. More study is needed on the matter, but it underscores the major importance of the colon in human evolution. The colon’s microbiome and anatomy hold much promise in illuminating our evolutionary past and teaching us about the importance of a healthy colon for overall health. Current data suggests the colon may be more variable in our species than previously thought, calling into question whether the representative colon used in medical and scientific textbooks and anatomy studies represents recent adaptations. Clues point to the adaptations being related to both the type and amount of fiber, as well as dietary constituents like butyrate.

Katsarski, M., & Singh, U. (1977). [Anatomical characteristics of the sigmoid intestine and their relationship to sigmoid volvulus among the population of Uganda and the city of Plovdiv, Bulgaria]. Khirurgiia, 30(2), 159-63. Retrieved May 10, 2011, from

Madiba, T. E., & Haffajee, M. R. (2011b). Sigmoid colon morphology in the population groups of Durban, South Africa, with special reference to sigmoid volvulus. Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 24(4), 441-53. doi: 10.1002/ca.21100.

Topping, D. L., Gooden, J. M., Brown, I. L., Biebrick, D. A., McGrath, L., Trimble, R. P., et al. (1997). A High Amylose (Amylomaize) Starch Raises Proximal Large Bowel Starch and Increases Colon Length in Pigs. J. Nutr., 127(4), 615-622. Retrieved May 9, 2011, from


Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5