Hi! I originally started eating paleo because of stomach problems and I've stuck with it because it makes me feel great. I am also a co-organizer for NYC's Eating Paleo in NYC Meetup Group. I was recently featured in the New York Times in an article about caveman-style life in NYC.
omega-3
For some reason I get Gwynyth Paltrow's "GOOP" newsletter, maybe because of her roasted chicken video, which laughably raised the ire of vegans. Nothing weird about roasted chicken, but apostates can't be tolerated...
Anyway, today her newsletter was about the diet she ate to get ready to play Pepper Potts in Iron Man. It was kind of a low-carb diet, but mostly just bare bones- smoothies, chicken, salad, turkey, low-carb wraps, soup...
When people tell me the paleo diet is "restrictive" I sometimes wonder what they mean by that. Hmm...not eating foods that make you feel like crap? What a revolutionary idea! And oh the horror of having to eat wild salmon or delicious braised lamb shanks.
I was surprised that I got a similar reaction with the limit nuts, chicken, olive oil, pork, and avocado post. I'm not saying these foods are delicious...but there is so much more out there! There is nothing bad or evil about them, but treating them like the main attraction in your diet is not the best way to emulate paleolithic fatty acid intake. The fact that they are so attractive to beginners is more a testament to our pathetic food culture than anything. Most Americans these days have never even tasted the deliciousness that is beef tongue. Things like olive oil are safe, easy...even politically correct.
There is really no arguing that grassfed meats are closer to paleolithic game than any animal that require grain/legume rations. People kept saying how much chickens are carnivores, but so far no one has ever found me an example of a farmer who doesn't feed their chickens grains/legumes at all...
If you eat grassfed ruminants nose to tail you will get plenty of luxurious and balanced fat. The tongue, the eyes, the face, and the bone marrow are so delicious! How can almonds even compare to these things? If you don't know, you should definitely give them a try. My diet is definitely more awesome and nourishing that any conventional diet like Paltrow's, though she is moving in the right direction by adding in some meat.
When I read about sad conventional diets like that it makes me sad. People are really missing out on great food that will make them feel great, altough these days the things I enjoy, like pork headcheese, are sadly a tough sell..
Either way, I'm going away this weekend for a hunting workshop. Wish me luck!
When I started out on paleo, I used to buy a container of almond butter every couple of days. Some of you might be thinking that it's a lot of omega-6, others might be thinking...what's the big deal? I think at the beginning of your paleo diet you shouldn't worry about omega-6 from whole foods like nuts. You will probably see great improvements, as I did, even on a diet dominated by nuts. I don't want to turn people off from paleo by making these foods seem problematic, but as time passes there might be issues you are still having and it make be worth going closer and closer to the diet of the Stone Age.
I think it's worth mentioning the economic concept of diminishing marginal returns here. The idea is that inputs initially contribute a great deal to production, but eventually the return per individual added unit decreases. It can be a useful analogy in dietary philosophy as well. I'm betting that the very basic first steps towards an evolutionarily appropriate diet are going to be the most significant for us- the removal of soda, candy bars, whole wheat bread, pasta, and other food that's mostly just bad. Beyond that we might get diminishing returns. I personally have cleared up a few minor problems by reducing my intake of omega-6 fatty acids from even whole foods, but they certainly aren't as significant as the ones I got from not eating vegetable shortening and high fructose corn syrup. We all have to look at how close we can get to our ancestor's food and how much is worth it, which can be very individual and can seem nitpicky and obsessive.


But people in the Stone Age didn't have to worry about these things because they simply weren't exposed to them. Nuts were a seasonal food, olive oil didn't exist, and humans simply didn't encounter avocados until we migrated to South America. Even if they are pastured, domestic hogs and poultry require significant amounts of legume and grain rations, so they are going to have very different fatty acid profiles anything our ancestors encountered. One of my friends who processes poultry told me the sad story of a farmer who tried to do pastured chicken without grain/legume rations and they were miserably sickly and thin. Domestic poultry isn't built for surviving on that diet.
I'm not saying that these foods are bad, but if you are on a paleo diet and you are still having some nagging problems, it might be worth limiting them.

This is the diet I've moved to personally. Nuts are there, but I'm no longer eating bags of them. I'm also through with my "lets eat every type of salted/cured pork for every meal" stage. A "basic" paleo diet took care of most of my problems, like GERD, but I still had some lingering IBS issues. Minimizing these foods that are on the borderline made a big difference, but it required trial and error. I've met people who can eat as much bacon as they want, but no tomatoes. When I eliminated nightshades...nothing happened that I could discern and I missed the taste. It just wasn't worth it.
I do think that just because we know saturated fat isn't the worst thing in the entire world means that we should eat as much as we want.
This interview with Cordain points out that while the Inuit were healthier than many modern Americans on an almost all-meat diet, there is evidence they had arterial plaque and lower bone density. I also think Kurt Harris has been a great voice of reason from the other side and his recommendation of mostly animals that eat grass has worked well for me. Probably because I am already thin, I have had good results with a "medium" saturated fat, low omega-6, and medium-carb diet. I don't need to count any calories or do any micromanaging if I eat mostly seafood, coconut, vegetables and things that ate grass...and treat the rest as dessert and flavoring.
What has been your experience?
Edit: Just want to clarify that I don't think saturated fat is bad. I certainly get more than any mainstream recommendation and get much of my calories from it, but I think there is an upper limit to how much is optimal.
I don't always agree with everything Fanatic Cook says, but her series of fish oil is worth reading.
- Fish oil isn't like fish
- Increased stroke risk from fish oil
- Increased risk of colitis from fish oil
My view on fish oil is: it's not as good as eating fish, it is often from suspect sources, and who knows what's really in it?
I used to take it, thinking it would cancel out the effects of excessive omega-6 in my diet. But my rule these days is "you can't eat a bunch of peanut butter and expect to cancel it out with fish oil." The modern Inuit are a good example of this. They get plenty of omega-3, but still suffer from obesity and diabetes.
Want to balance your fatty acids? Don't eat oil, do eat fresh oily fish. There are so many tasty fish out there that there is no reason to take fish oil.
My other rule: if you don't want to taste it, don't put it in your mouth. Our tastebuds evolved for a reason- to protect us from poisonous foods and to encourage us to nourish ourselves. Don't bypass them. If you take cod liver oil, buy the unflavored stuff. Your mouth will tell you when you've had enough :)

The gate of knowledge is closed!
Oh how ungrateful I was back then when I was enrolled in a big university. I didn't realize how annoying it would be to not have access to a large academic library. Sciencedirect now asks me to pay five gazillion dollars for the studies I want to read. It almost makes me want to enroll in school again.
I live in freaking NYC, but the library here doesn't have the richness of that library in the middle of Illinois.
When I did have access to the wonderful online research databases, I remember seeing that some misguided nutritionists and anthropologists cited papers by S. Boyd Eaton when they tried to say the paleolithic diet was plant-based and low-fat. So it's nice to see Eaton himself in this recent article about the paleolithic diet in Macleans eat his hat:
He says he had failed to consider the contribution of non-muscle meat like brain and fat depots, and thus underestimated the amount of fat we need. “It makes me feel stupid!”
Oops. Also on display is tehstupid
Konnor still thinks that was the right call, and believes his original concerns about fat were prudent. “You can’t just go to the supermarket and buy meat loaded with fat and say you’re doing the Paleolithic diet. You’re not.”
Ugh, such an annoying misconception perpetuated by restaurants that serve miserable cuts of miserable game for miserable prices. Yeah, that wild boar tenderloin roast at terrible overpriced restaurant is lean because the company that sold it is feeding the public's desire for "lean" healthy game. Any real hunter can tell that that game varies in fat content by species and season. Some game is very very fatty! And the cuts served at Green Meadows Fancy Golf Course Grill, typically lean cuts, are not representative of the real richness of game. This Hazda article speaks more to traditional consumption
Bones are smashed with rocks and the marrow sucked out. Grease is rubbed on the skin as a sort of moisturizer. No one speaks a word, but the smacking of lips and gnashing of teeth is almost comically loud.
Speaking of bones, I just finished reading the excellent cookbook Bones, by Jennifer McLagan. A full post on this excellent book is due, as bones are absolutely essential for a successful paleo diet, providing ample amounts of fat, calcium, and other important nutrients.
Also, what's the deal with lacto paleo? I must say I'm not a fan of this trend or term. A paleo diet with dairy is not a paleo diet, it's a nomadic pastoralist diet. Such pastoralists are pretty healthy, but they are not representative of stone agers. There is absolutely no convincing evidence that dairy is paleo. That doesn't mean it's bad, but it does lead to some dilution of the paleo terminology.
Also annoying is this NY Times article about some who argue that depression is somehow an evolutionary adaptation. In my opinion it's like arguing that heart disease is an evolutionary adaptation. I think it's fairly clear that depression is a disease of civilization caused by living inappropriately to our evolutionary heritage whether it's working inside all day staring at a glowing rectangle or not getting enough omega-3 fatty acids. Unfortunately this viewpoint is not in the article. The opposing view is that it's a hopeless disorder that can only be treated with modern drugs.
I thought about that when reading the graphic novel bio of logician Bertrand Russell. He is devastated by the schizophrenia that seems to be an inevitable part of his bloodline. But there is increasing evidence that omega-3 fatty acids play a role. That this type of research is being done in the age of drug fixes is very hopeful and I would bet that scientists will eventually find even more nutritional factors that govern mental illness.

This post by Holly Hickman takes issue with the idea that phytic acid in nuts is bad news. I posted very recently about this issue and came to the opposite conclusion. Perhaps it is because my site is oriented towards people eating paleo to help autoimmune conditions. Holly is right that every plant food contains some sort of "don't eat me" chemical. You can be sensitive to many of these...or none of them. There are plenty of people who gobble down Planter's Mixed Nuts without a problem, but I'm not one of them. I can eat a few fresh nuts, but something like almond-flour crackers would make me sick for days. If your gut has problems, it's worth it to examine your intake of plant foods and figure out which ones are making your problems worse.
It's also worth remembering that nuts were seasonal and eaten in small amounts by paleolithic people. When we buy shell nuts we forget how tough they are to crack! Shelled nuts might also be a bad idea because the fats in nuts can go rancid easily. Rancid fats might sound gross, but actually some rancid fats do not have a detectable taste or smell.
That's bad news, because according to Oxidized Fat in the Diet by Jeffrey S. Cohn is a review article summarizing several research studies,
Consumption of lower levels of oxidized fat on repeated occasions may pose a more chronic threat to health, however, particularly because low-level oxidation of meat, milk, poultry and cereal products during storage and processing is virtually unavoidable [4]. More extreme oxidation of fat can also occur when oils are used for cooking.
He mentions that the natural oxidation of cholesterol produces at least 30 different compounds that are biologically active and are particularly prevalent in the milk and egg powders used in processed foods. Compounds such of these are shown in experiments to absorb quite easily into the intestinal wall. In animal studies, oxidized fat led to higher incidence of atherosclerosis. In studies of healthy adults, the consumption of these fats led to impaired arterial function. These effects were not seen following low-fat meals or meals of less oxidized fats.
Comparative Nutritional Value of Diets Containing Rancid Fat, Neutral Fat, and No Fat by Dorothy Whipple is an old one and describes the diet of lab animals. Lab rats fed slightly rancid fats slowly developed horrible symptoms like swelling, hair loss, and neurological degeneration...and eventually died prematurely. Animals fed no fats developed the typical dry-skin symptoms and lived somewhat longer. Animals fed fresh fats were the healthiest and lived the longest. The researcher concluded that in terms of her experimental animals, it was better to feed no fat than oxidized fat, though neither was optimal.
Nuts are probably not the worst source of rancid fats. If you are eating paleo, you are avoiding most of the worst sources like cereals, milk powders, egg powders, and other trash. But I still think it's worth seeking out the best freshest nuts if you are going to eat them. This nut-growing website notes that "Levels of vitamin E are reduced by around 30% after three months of refrigerated storage."....most walnuts aren't even refrigerated. The best chefs contract with growers and buy fresh nuts which they freeze.
I'm definitely thinking of contacting a NY farmer and doing a nut CSA here. Right now there isn't one, which is too bad.

One of the best part of the paleo diet is that unlike the Zone, tracking your food is not a requirement of the diet. Paleo is about foods rather than numbers. But sometimes I actually do track my intake. Not often, but it's a good check up. I use a freeware tool called Cron O Meter every so often and it's often very interesting. For awhile I had issues with fatigue, but when I did a Cron O Meter check in I realized I wasn't getting enough calories! That's actually an easy mistake to make on paleo because of all the foods we aren't eating. Often when I eat at restaurants my meal is a normal one with the bread or pasta subtracted. Sadly, it's not like they are giving me more meat to make up for it. It's a great way to accidentally undereat yourself into tiredness and irritability.
Also it's a good reality check on hard to get nutrients like calcium. I realized last year that I simply wasn't getting enough and that was a major motivator to start eating stock and bony fish. It's also a reality check on cheats! Putting in that slice of cake and seeing your numbers mess up really makes you question whether it was worth it.
Nuts are delicious...they aren't a grain, they are full of fat, low-carb, they are "paleo" what is there not to love?
Apparently, lots. I addressed their imbalance of fats in a previous post and how they probably aren't paleo, but today an article on Cheeseslave about dental health got me interested in more:
In the interview, Rami told me that peanuts are as bad as soybeans when it comes to phytic acid content. He said that nuts are extremely high in phytic acid. He said that he thinks peanut butter that has not been soaked and sprouted is a “garbage food”. Rami told me that seeds are the absolute worst. Even worse than soy or peanuts. Sesame seeds have double or triple the phytic acid that soy has.
Let's look at the data:

How can paleo dieters bash grains and legumes for antinutrients when they are eating just as many in the form of nuts and seeds? It makes me wonder... which is really a better choice: a "paleo" pancake made from almond butter or a traditionally fermented idli? The idli probably has less phytic acid, that's for sure.
Since phytic acid robs the body of minerals, I think I will avoid it best I can. If I think about it carefully, since I am eating expensive meat...when I eat phytic acid it is robbing me of money!
The paleo diet can blind people by forcing them to argue about the history of food rather than its objective properties. But nuts lose either way. The only evidence of large-scale consumption of nuts comes from mesolithic and neolithic societies. They were between agrarian and foragers, as they still consumed wild foods, but they also engaged in activities that boasted nut production. As I was reminded in a recent permaculture workshop I took (you can view the slideshow from it here), agroforestry is still a form of agriculture.
woman will be happy when I spend all day gathering 1000 tiny seeds to make tahini with instead of clubbing a deer
While nuts are well-accepted as paleolithic foods, seeds are little more contentious. Technically nuts ARE seeds, but botanics aside, what we think of as nuts are big enough that gathering a decent amount of calories from them in the wild is feasible. The same can't be said for seeds- most are tiny and it can take a long time to harvest enough to make anything out of. I learned this harvesting pigweed seeds. I was hoping to get enough of this amaranth relative to make porridge with, but I ended up with only enough to garnish a piece of fish.
What about their place in a modern paleo diet? After all, we eat plenty of things that would have been tough to gather. For me, the problem with seeds is that if you eat large amounts of them you will be eating nutrients in ratios and amounts that are not appropriate for us evolutionarily. Furthermore, the polyunsaturated fats in them go rancid easily. While some might find hemp useful, I think it's a bad food, at least in the US because you cannot buy it whole and how long has that hemp powder been sitting on the shelf? Probably long enough to render some of those nice omega-3 fatty acids rotten. Flax is a popular ingredient in "paleo" baked goods, but ground and shoved in the oven, the fats can't be good.
Furthermore, if you eat lots of seeds with the exception of flax, the ratio of omega-6 fatty acids to omega-3 fatty acids is likely to tip towards the latter, which is probably not a good thing.
Several sources of information suggest that human beings evolved on a diet with a ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 essential fatty acids (EFA) of approximately 1 whereas in Western diets the ratio is 15/1-16.7/1. Western diets are deficient in omega-3 fatty acids, and have excessive amounts of omega-6 fatty acids compared with the diet on which human beings evolved and their genetic patterns were established. Excessive amounts of omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and a very high omega-6/omega-3 ratio, as is found in today's Western diets, promote the pathogenesis of many diseases, including cardiovascular disease, cancer, and inflammatory and autoimmune disease
Furthermore, the conversion of any omega-3 from plants in your diet is hampered. The omega-3 fatty acids present in plants, alpha linolenic acid, is not immediately usable in the body. In order to be used, it must be converted to Docosahexaenoic acid. The enzymes that do this conversion are called Holman's enzymes. Unfortunately, they are also responsible for converting omega-6 fatty acids (mostly linoleic acid) to arachidonic acid. Lots of omega-6 means that there is not enough of Holman's enzymes to do the job. This is discussed in Susan Allport's book The Queen of Fats
Data for the US indicate that Americans consume between 11 and 16 grams of linoleic acid per day during the years 1989 and 91 and about 1 to 2 grams of alpha linolenic acid. At that ratio, only about 15 percent of the alpha linolenic acid is converted to DHA and eicosapentaenoic acid. At lower ratios, the conservation rate is much higher. The best conversion occurs at a ratio of 2.3:1
For paleo dieters who eat seafood, this shouldn't be a huge problem, but if not, it can be an issue.
Let's also talk about phytic acid, an anti-nutrient present in many seeds, can reduce mineral absorption. There are a couple of other issues, like some estrogenic compounds in flax.
So that's why, in the Paleo Foods section of the site, I classify seeds as Not Paleo, but give the pros and cons. Some tahini sauce on your kale probably isn't as bad as some whole bran bread, but I would recommend keeping their consumption low. Use them as if you had to gather them yourself.



More comments